Irregular Warfare

smallwarsjournal.jpg

Applying Iraq to Afghanistan

Below is an exerpt from the article:

"Now that the new US strategy for prosecuting the war in Afghanistan has been determined, military leaders and media pundits are turning their attention to discussions of the best manner in which to implement and execute the strategy. As the military develops plans supporting the strategy and journalists search for stories about the plans, both will ask three questions:

First, what made US forces successful during the Iraq war; second, do those successes provide lessons learned for Afghanistan; and finally, how could US personnel translate those lessons to future military operations regardless of the culture and geography? This essay is certainly not the first to investigate these three questions; however, it is unique because it supports no political or military agenda regarding the war in Afghanistan."

To read the rest of the article, please click here.

smallwarsjournal.jpg
 

U.S. Capabilities to Manage Irregular Conflicts in the 21st Century

Date: 
Jul 8 (12:00pm - 1:00pm)

Defying common wisdom, most security challenges in the world today are not random, unrelated happenings. Rather, they are part of a conflict environment in which a burgeoning number of armed groups and other non-state actors, sometimes aided by authoritarian states, constitute the predominant and persistent sources of instability. Clear patterns can be seen in the global security environment and they will continue to threaten peace and security for at least the next quarter of a century. Dr. Roy Godson and Dr. Richard Shultz will discuss these patterns and highlight key findings and recommendations from a new report – Adapting America’s Security Paradigm and Security Agenda. The report was produced with the assistance of senior security practitioners from democracies around the world under the auspices of the National Strategy Information Center. Godson and Shultz argue that the United States needs a set of tools and skills suited to the world as it is and as it is likely to evolve, not as it was.

More About the Speakers

Roy Godson, Ph.D.
President
National Strategy Information Center (NSIC)
and Emeritus Professor of Government
Georgetown University

Richard Shultz, Ph.D.
Professor and Director
International Security Studies Program, Fletcher School, Tufts University
and NSIC Research Director

Ariel Cohen, Ph. D.
Senior Research Fellow
The Heritage Foundation

Hosted By

James Carafano, Ph.D.

Deputy Director, The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies and Director, Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies

"The Gravest Threat" to Internal Security: India's Maoist Insurgency

Date: 
Jul 15 (3:30pm - 5:30pm)

Speakers:

P.V. Ramana, Research Fellow, Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses (New Delhi)
Srinivas Reddy, Deputy Editor, The Hindu (Hyderabad)
Nandini Sundar, Professor of Sociology, Delhi University

Wilton Park: ‘Hearts and Minds’

Date: 
Mar 11 (12:00pm) - Mar 14 (12:00pm)

In partnership with the Feinstein International Center, Tufts University. Development assistance is becoming an increasingly important tool to “win hearts and minds” and promote stability in counterinsurgency (COIN) operations. This conference will assess the relationship between development aid and stabilisation in Afghanistan, presenting the findings of two major research projects on this issue together with the experiences of senior civilian and military practitioners. It will then broaden the discussion to the delivery of development aid in conflict environments more generally and the implications for COIN and stabilisation doctrine.

Wilton Park Conference Report

Development aid is becoming an increasingly important tool to ‘win hearts and minds’ and promote stability in counter-insurgency (COIN) operations. Given its centrality to current COIN doctrine and strategy, there is still a surprisingly weak evidence base for the effectiveness of aid in promoting stabilisation and security objectives. The main purpose of this conference was to bring together leading academics, policymakers, military personnel and civilian practitioners to explore what evidence does exist. The conference participants were presented with the findings of recent field research conducted by academics on the relationship between aid and security, listened to military and civilian practitioners regarding their experiences implementing stabilisation projects, and heard from policymakers regarding the implications of the evidence for COIN and development policies.

Wilton Park Conference Report 1022.pdf

June 10th Newsletter.jpg

June 10th Newsletter.jpg

June 10th Newsletter.jpg

Syndicate content