Leadership and Management

U.S. Capabilities to Manage Irregular Conflicts in the 21st Century

Date: 
Jul 8 (12:00pm - 1:00pm)

Defying common wisdom, most security challenges in the world today are not random, unrelated happenings. Rather, they are part of a conflict environment in which a burgeoning number of armed groups and other non-state actors, sometimes aided by authoritarian states, constitute the predominant and persistent sources of instability. Clear patterns can be seen in the global security environment and they will continue to threaten peace and security for at least the next quarter of a century. Dr. Roy Godson and Dr. Richard Shultz will discuss these patterns and highlight key findings and recommendations from a new report – Adapting America’s Security Paradigm and Security Agenda. The report was produced with the assistance of senior security practitioners from democracies around the world under the auspices of the National Strategy Information Center. Godson and Shultz argue that the United States needs a set of tools and skills suited to the world as it is and as it is likely to evolve, not as it was.

More About the Speakers

Roy Godson, Ph.D.
President
National Strategy Information Center (NSIC)
and Emeritus Professor of Government
Georgetown University

Richard Shultz, Ph.D.
Professor and Director
International Security Studies Program, Fletcher School, Tufts University
and NSIC Research Director

Ariel Cohen, Ph. D.
Senior Research Fellow
The Heritage Foundation

Hosted By

James Carafano, Ph.D.

Deputy Director, The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies and Director, Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies

CCO Case Study No. 4-Kuwait Task Force-Student.pdf

SIGIR Applying Hard Lessons.jpg

SIGIR - Applying Iraqs Hard Lessons

SIGIR Applying Hard Lessons.jpg
The office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction recently released a new report entitled Applying Iraq's Hard Lessons to the Reform of Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations. The report proposes an answer to the question of who should be accountable for planning, managing, and executing stabilization and reconstruction operations (SROs). The paper is divided into three parts. Part I provides a brief background on SROs. Part II posits ten targeted reforms that could improve SRO execution. Part III proposes a new structural solution to address the weaknesses in SRO planning and management: the U. S. Office for Contingency Operations.

civilian_assistance_afghani_cvr.jpg

USIP: Leadership on Civilian Assistance

civilian_assistance_afghani_cvr.jpg

New from USIP: Establishing Leadership on Civilian Assitance to Afghanistan by William B. Taylor, Jr. and J Alexander Their



By all accounts, the civilian role in creating a stable Afghanistan, capable of protecting its citizens and providing essential services, is at least as important as the military operation. President Barack Obama said on December 1, 2009 that 30,000 additional U.S. forces “will help create the conditions for the United States to transfer responsibility to the Afghans.” But this task cannot be exclusively focused on military forces. The development of Afghan capacity and leadership on the civilian side is also fundamental to our success. So, who is in charge?

A CNP DISCUSSION SERIES: DISCUSSION 2: PRTs: Implementing Lessons Learned

Date: 
Jan 11 (12:30pm - 1:30pm)

A CNP Discussion Series


PROVINCIAL RECONSTRUCTION TEAMS: Evaluating their Role in Iraq, Afghanistan and Future Conflicts


Enhancing governance and development capabilities is vital to long term stability in Iraq and Afghanistan, and central to U.S. counterinsurgency strategy in both countries. With this in mind, the Center for National Policy continues its discussion series examining the role of PRTs from a number of a different angles. The discussions in this series cover topics including the strategic value of PRTs in Iraq and Afghanistan, lessons learned and their implementation and the applicability of PRTs to future conflicts. Please note: The discussions in this series will be off the record.


Discussion 2:


PRTs: Implementing Lessons Learned


FEATURING


Tod Wilson Deputy Director and Senior Advisor for Transitional Security Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS), Department of State


Michael Hallett CDR, US Navy NATO Allied Command Transformation Lessons Learned Staff Officer


Dan Madden Military Legislative Assistant, Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN)


Moderator: Dr. T.X. Hammes, Col USMC (Ret) INSS, NDU


 


Register At: http://www.cnponline.org/ht/d/RegisterForEvent/i/16871


 

IPI.jpg

IPI: The Monitoring and Evalution of Peace Operations

A new report has been published by the International Peace Institute: "The Monitoring and Evalution of Peace Operations"


In spite of positive indications, the challenges ahead for developing more effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) methodologies for peace operations are considerable. There are still many institutional, bureaucratic, and conceptual barriers that need to be overcome — or at least managed better — in order for significant progress to be made. This report is the product of a two-day workshop titled, “The Monitoring and Evaluation of Peace Operations,” hosted by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and the International Peace Institute (IPI). The workshop highlighted the theoretical, methodological, and institutional issues related to M&E processes, and offered several recommendations for fostering best practices and more effective monitoring and evaluation techniques, in light of the opportunities and challenges..


Available from the International Peace Institute.

SIGIR logo.jpg

Syndicate content